Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
 Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
Comparativa de definición de detalles a ISO base entre el revelado de los archivos RAW del sensor X-Trans 5 HR de la Fujifilm X-T5 y el sensor X-Trans 4 de 26 megapíxeles. 
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
|
Scoop.it!
There's no real reason the new Classic Negative (Fuji Superia) look will work only on some cameras, so I made Presets/Styles and a LUT for this process that you can doenload for free.
hpc's insight:
2019/11/03/
|
The article "X-Trans 5 HR (Fujifilm X-T5 / X-H2) vs X-Trans 4: the loser, Lightroom..." discusses the real performance of the 40-megapixel sensors of Fujifilm X-T5 and Fujifilm X-H2. Some people claimed that the new X-Trans 5 sensor is a step backward compared to the X-Trans 4, but the author found this hard to believe. When he used the Fujifilm X-T5 with a Fujinon XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR lens, he saw the potential of the 40-megapixel sensor compared to the previous generation, and the improvement in JPEGs was noticeable. The article then discusses the author's comparison of the X-T5's sensor with that of his previous camera, the X-T30, using Lightroom to develop the RAW files. Surprisingly, the level of detail was very similar between the two cameras. The author attributes this to Lightroom's inability to handle the X-Trans sensors effectively, as other RAW processing software does a better job of extracting detail from these sensors. The article concludes that while Lightroom may not be the best choice for processing Fujifilm X-Trans RAW files, the X-Trans 5 sensor is not a loser, as some have claimed.